SC’s constitution benches to hear eight matters, including Aadhaar, from Wednesday
The Supreme Court’s five-judge constitution benches will commence the hearing on eight critical matters, including the one related to the validity of Aadhaar, from 17 January
New Delhi: Amid the ongoing rift between the chief justice of India and four seniormost judges over assignment of cases, the Supreme Court’s five-judge constitution benches will commence the hearing on eight critical matters, including the one related to the validity of Aadhaar, from 17 January.
The information was uploaded on the website of the apex court.
Besides the challenge to the constitutional validity of the Aadhaar Act, the constitution benches, the composition of which has not been uploaded so far on the apex court’s website, will also deal with a challenge to its 2013 judgment, re-criminalising gay sex between consenting adults.
The constitution benches would hear the contentious issue relating to the ban on the entry of women between 10 and 50 years of age in Kerala’s Sabarimala temple and also resume the hearing on a legal query on whether a Parsi woman would lose her religious identity if she married a man from a different religion. The other contentious matter relates to the challenge to the validity of a penal law on adultery, which only punishes a married man for having an extra-marital sexual relationship with a woman married to someone else.
The other issues which would be dealt with by the constitution benches include the pleas, which have raised a question as to when will a lawmaker, facing a criminal trial, stand disqualified. All these matters were earlier referred to larger benches for adjudication on important legal issues by separate benches of the apex court.
These matters will come up for hearing from 17 January.
In an unprecedented move, four seniormost judges of the apex court—justices J. Chelameswar, Ranjan Gogoi, M.B. Lokur and Kurian Joseph—at a press conference on Friday, had mounted a virtual revolt against the CJI, listing a litany of problems, including the assignment of cases. They had said that there were certain issues afflicting the country’s highest court and warned that these could destroy the Indian democracy.
- Arvind Kejriwal resumes work, reviews progress of water, power projects
- Asian politics gets trumped along with growth
- Nirmala Sitharaman, Sushma Swaraj to visit US for 2+2 talks
- Average sugarcane yield in Karnataka sees decline on continuous irrigation
- Benjamin Netanyahu’s wife charged with misuse of public funds
Editor's Picks »
- Why Indian paint makers are shifting to water-based paints
- 2019 elections still some time away but defence stocks get the jitters
- Complan and Horlicks sale signals low energy in health drinks market
- With fall of the last dove, MPC minutes portend more than one RBI rate hike
- RITES IPO ticks the valuations box, but not the growth one