Xiaomi could be twice as expensive as Apple
Xiaomi has a fair value of about $65 billion to $85 billion, translating into around 27 times to 34 times forecasts for its 2019 adjusted earnings, roughly twice that of Apple
Hong Kong: Chinese serial entrepreneur Lei Jun has been compared with Steve Jobs. Now, analysts are saying the smartphone giant he built could be twice as expensive as Apple Inc.
Xiaomi Corp. deserves to trade at a premium to global phone brands due to its market-share gains and faster growth trajectory, according to research from Morgan Stanley, one of banks leading its Hong Kong IPO. The Beijing-based company has a fair value of about $65 billion to $85 billion, translating into around 27 times to 34 times forecasts for its 2019 adjusted earnings, Morgan Stanley wrote in a report this week.
That’s roughly double Apple’s valuation of 14.5 times estimated 2019 adjusted earnings, data compiled by Bloomberg show. Xiaomi should also fetch richer multiples than rival smart hardware makers like Fitbit Inc. and GoPro Inc., as well as some major Chinese internet firms including Alibaba Group Holding Ltd and Baidu Inc., according to Morgan Stanley.
While such pre-deal research is prepared by a bank’s equity analysts, not their investment bankers, it may provide a clue into how Xiaomi plans to sell its growth story. Xiaomi, which has been planning to seek about $10 billion, is considering raising about half that from its Hong Kong IPO and the other half from an offering in mainland China, people with knowledge of the matter have said.
Xiaomi could be valued at as much as $92 billion given the strong growth in its cash flows beyond 2020, JPMorgan Chase & Co. analysts wrote in a separate report. Its success is based on offering “world-class products” at low prices while selling high-margin services, according to CLSA Ltd.
The Chinese company could boost smartphone shipments 42% this year to 130 million units, CLSA estimates. They may rise further to 179 million shipments in 2019 and 218.6 million units in 2020, analysts at CLSA wrote in a research report. That’s in the neighbourhood of the 216.8 million iPhones shipped by Apple in its latest financial year.
Xiaomi has emerged as the gateway to about 100 million users in China, who are monetized via a suite of online services, Goldman Sachs Group Inc. analysts wrote in their own report. Analysts at the bank, one of Xiaomi’s IPO sponsors, gave Xiaomi a forward equity valuation range of $70 billion to $86 billion. That translates into 26 times to 32 times its forecast adjusted 2019 net income, according to Goldman Sachs.
“Xiaomi integrates the internet user experience with hardware to offer an unrivaled user experience,” Goldman Sachs wrote in the report. “The company’s hardware aggregates traffic, its software builds platforms, and its internet services generate revenue and profit.”
The Chinese company is coming to market as the smartphone industry plateaus: replacement cycles are lengthening, even as more mature markets approach saturation. Xiaomi is trying to increase higher-margin services as a proportion of revenue.
CLSA, Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley are leading Xiaomi’s Hong Kong IPO as joint sponsors, according to an exchange filing last month. Credit Suisse Group AG, Deutsche Bank AG, JPMorgan and six Chinese banks are also helping arrange the share sale, people with knowledge of the matter have said.
- Education start-up Byju’s aims Rs1,400 crore revenue this year
- Taj Hotels wins bid to run The Connaught for 33 years
- Vedanta says acid leak severe at Sterlite copper plant in Tamil Nadu’s Thoothukudi
- Jet Airways inducts first of 150 Boeing 737 Max planes
- Fox-Disney deal: Rupert Murdoch’s firm agrees to $71 billion bid, in blow to Comcast
Editor's Picks »
- With fall of the last dove, MPC minutes portend more than one RBI rate hike
- RITES IPO ticks the valuations box, but not the growth one
- Is Reliance Jio really India’s most profitable telecom firm?
- How US-China trade war will affect India
- Dear ICICI Bank board, giving a red card to Chanda Kochhar is not enough